Skills/PyPI/plane-mcp-server-pro

plane-mcp-server-pro@0.2.9

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "An unofficial Pro-enhanced Model Context Protocol server for Plane integration" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry PyPI (MCP server)Publisher rendercoder · publishing for 153 daysInstalls 54Last detonated 14 min ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Before you give it your token

It will ask for
PLANE_ACCESS_TOKENPLANE_API_KEYPLANE_OAUTH_PROVIDER_BASE_URLPLANE_OAUTH_PROVIDER_CLIENT_IDPLANE_OAUTH_PROVIDER_CLIENT_SECRETPLANE_PRO_PERSONAL_TOKENConfiguration, not credentials: MCP_PATH_PREFIX, PLANE_BASE_URL, PLANE_INTERNAL_BASE_URL, PLANE_PRO_BASE_URL, PLANE_WORKSPACE_SLUG, REDIS_HOST, REDIS_PORT
Where it talks to
no vendor host named in the codeAlso plane.so, my-server.com — not the publisher's domain; check what for before connecting.
What the honeypot saw
nothing has run yet
What we could not test
everything: the server has not run yet

Run it before you trust it. Nothing has run yet: the code was read, the server was not. `vet-skills try` runs this exact version in the honeypot in about a minute.

Never paste a credential into a chat, a ticket or a report, including ours. How the guard holds it.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
Dense URL-encoded contenttests/test_task_api_client.py:58 · Dense URL-encoded content — may be obfuscating payloads"?q=%E6%B6%82%E9%B8%A6+API&limit=10&include_description=false&include_comments=true"Fix: Put hosts, commands and strings in plain source. Decoding at runtime looks identical to malware and costs points on its own.
AST07
MEDIUM
document.cookie accesstests/test_oauth_security.py:149 · document.cookie access — can steal session cookies"javascript:alert(document.cookie)",Fix: Replace encoded or assembled strings with plain literals and remove undeclared network calls.
AST07

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈60 tok
1 file · 49 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Not checked against OSV yet; the weekly check has not reached this version.

What would make this Verified

13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim rendercoder: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. Dense URL-encoded content≈ +2 on the totalPut hosts, commands and strings in plain source. Decoding at runtime looks identical to malware and costs points on its own.
  3. document.cookie access≈ +2 on the totalReplace encoded or assembled strings with plain literals and remove undeclared network calls.
Publish a new version to PyPI, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim rendercoderPropose a patch to the maintainer