yotta-item@0.1.3
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "命题组卷(元题)—— 按双向细目表从本地题库确定性选题组卷:先保证必考考点覆盖,再按难度配额补足,固定 seed 可复算(题库不足时报缺口,不用编造的题顶替);check 子命令对已有试卷做确定性缺口检查(未知题 / 重复题 / 总分偏差 / 分节题量与分值偏差 / 难度分布漂移 / 考点缺失 / 超出限时),支持 --gate findings=n 接入 CI;零依赖本地运行,不联网、不调用模型、不生成或改写题面、不内置题目与教材原文。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 64/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
16 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim yottameta: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
- npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +2 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.