yotta-item@0.1.2
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "命题组卷(元题)—— 按双向细目表从本地题库确定性选题组卷:先保证必考考点覆盖,再按难度配额补足,固定 seed 可复算(题库不足时报缺口,不用编造的题顶替);check 子命令对已有试卷做确定性缺口检查(未知题 / 重复题 / 总分偏差 / 分节题量与分值偏差 / 难度分布漂移 / 考点缺失 / 超出限时),支持 --gate findings=n 接入 CI;零依赖本地运行,不联网、不调用模型、不生成或改写题面、不内置题目与教材原文。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-02 and scored it 64/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
What would make this Verified
16 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim yottameta: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
- npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +2 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.