Skills/ClawHub/unisound-operation-record

unisound-operation-record@1.0.2

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "根据手术相关病历素材生成规范的手术记录。输入术前小结、术中记录、术后记录等，调用内部医疗大模型，输出结构化手术记录（含手术日期、时间、地点、医生、手术名称、指征、诊断、经过、异常情况、术后情况、签名等 14 个字段）。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher unisound-llm · publishing for 121 daysInstalls 1,000Last detonated 3d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 474 lines in 4 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈810 tok
1 file · 4 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim unisound-llm: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim unisound-llmPropose a patch to the maintainer