Skills/ClawHub/unisound-med-knowledge-qa

unisound-med-knowledge-qa@1.0.2

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "医学考试、专科问答、文献阅读理解、名词规范解释与术语同义匹配等知识问答。由调用方传入题目，经内部医疗大模型作答；通过 --task 选择具体场景提示词；仅含 `scripts/run.py`，可独立拷贝部署。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher unisound-llm · publishing for 122 daysInstalls 1,093Last detonated 3d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 456 lines in 3 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈492 tok
1 file · 3 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim unisound-llm: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim unisound-llmPropose a patch to the maintainer