skill-lifecycle-guardian@2.0.12
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Skill 全生命周期守护者。—— 每日自动扫描所有 workspace,检测新增/变更的 Skill。 功能一:动态发现所有 agent workspace 下的 Skill,无需手动配置扫描范围。 功能二:功能重叠检测(新增时),若发现相似/重复则发出提醒。 功能三:新增/变更 Skill 自动生成或更新使用..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
> chmod +x ~/.openclaw/workspace/skills/skill-lifecycle-guardian/guardian-check.shFix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.No other findings across 413 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim nathemkingh: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- File permission modification command≈ +2 on the totalRequest the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.