multi-agent-collaboration-2@0.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "当用户想用多个 AI/Agent 协作完成产品开发、内容生产、代码修改、MVP 迭代或复杂任务交付时使用本技能。适用于搭建 Multi-agent Collaboration 工作流：用户/Owner 负责方向和验收，一个 AI 负责需求澄清、方案拆解、任务编排与审查，另一个或多个执行 Agent干活。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 395 lines in 4 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim allin-zhang: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.