investment-project-assessment@1.0.3
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "围绕目标企业或招商项目的产业属性、投资规模、落地条件、产业带动能力、经济贡献潜力、 区域匹配度、投资可行性及风险约束等核心维度，系统评估该企业或项目是否值得招引、是否适合落地、 落地后能为区域带来什么价值，以及推进过程中需要重点关注哪些风险。本技能核心解决"这个项目值不值得招、 能不能落、落地价值有多大、对产业有没有带动、投资是否可行、政府应如何推进"等核心问题。 当用户需要评估招商项目、筛选招商线索、判断项目投资价值、分析项目产业带动能力、 为招商项目上会决策提供材料、对比多个招商项目优先级、判断项目落地条件成熟度、 形成招商项目评估报告时，激活此技能。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 649 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim daviddatamining: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.