interview-review@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "帮求职者复盘真实面试，分析表现并给出改进建议。当用户面试结束后说"帮我复盘面试""刚面完想分析下""这场面试我表现怎么样""帮我看看哪里答得不好""面试录音/记录帮我分析"，或贴出面试问答记录、面试转写文本希望诊断时触发。本技能识别表达亮点与风险、分析面试官考察意图、给出可执行的优化方向和参考回答。即使用户没明说..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 164 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim shutongzhou1222: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.