code-review-promax@2.2.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "高级代码审查 Agent。对用户提供的 diff、文件、commit、GitHub PR 或 GitLab MR 进行高质量、 上下文感知、回归风险导向的代码审查，输出可执行、结构化的审查结论，适合合入决策。 触发词：code review, CR, 代码审查, 审查代码, review代码, review PR/diff/commit, review MR, review merge request, review修改, review当前的修改, 帮我review, 帮我看看代码, 看看有没有问题, 帮我检查一下代码, 代码有没有问题, 这段代码怎么样, 改动有没有风险, 能不能合入, review一下, 帮我过一遍代码, 检查一下改动, review这个PR, review这个MR. 快捷命令（不区分大小写，独立消息或句首出现即触发本 skill）：CRPM, CDRV, CRPX, CRP, CODR, CORD. NOT for: general code questions, debugging live issues, or writing new code from scratch. (Exception: the bundled fix/ sub-skill applies user-approved review fixes one by one.)" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 899 lines in 5 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim z-zihan: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.