ad-creative@r1
VERIFIED· install onlyPublisher claims: "When the user wants to write or judge ad creative, or asks which ad, hook, or angle to run or kill: headlines, primary text, and variations for Google, Meta, LinkedIn, and TikTok, fresh angles when creative fatigues. Test hypotheses name the metric, comparison, and expected direction. No AI tells like 'it's not X, it's Y'. For campaign strategy, see ads. For landing pages, see copywriting." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Coverage
Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.- Tested
- every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
- Not tested
- use of the skill by an agent
Is ad-creative@r1 safe to install?
KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-15 and scored it 92/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Behavior trace
Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviationsStatic findings
"Explains the unicorn-scaler vs. supporting-cast lens (B-tier = mid-funnel, don't kill for failing to scale cold)",Fix: Put hosts, commands and strings in plain source. Decoding at runtime looks identical to malware and costs points on its own.No other findings across 3,535 lines in 14 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.