Skills/PyPI/rationalbloks-mcp

rationalbloks-mcp@0.16.2

VERIFIED· not started

Publisher claims: "RationalBloks MCP Server - Deploy production REST APIs and Neo4j Graph APIs in minutes: projects, schemas, deployments, modules, object storage, and graph data." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry PyPI (MCP server) · listed in the official MCP RegistryPublisher rationalbloks · publishing for 292 daysInstalls 537Last detonated 16 h ago
$claude mcp add rationalbloks-mcp -- uvx rationalbloks-mcp
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Not started: dependency install failed; the server itself was not observed.
Tested
the dependency install step · every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
server startup · the tool list · tool behavior

What this means for the label: Verified here covers what ran. The server's tools were not exercised with a real credential, so nothing about their behavior is asserted; the credential summary below says what to do with that.

Before you give it your token

It will ask for
RATIONALBLOKS_API_KEYConfiguration, not credentials: LOGICBLOK_URL, RATIONALBLOKS_DEBUG, TRANSPORT
Where it talks to
rationalbloks.com (its own)Also cluster.local — not the publisher's domain; check what for before connecting.
What the honeypot saw
no credential files read · no network
What we could not test
server startup · the tool list · tool behavior

Connect it with a scoped credential, under the guard, and read the third-party hosts first. The code names cluster.local as well as its own vendor. The guard injects RATIONALBLOKS_API_KEY only into requests to rationalbloks.com (and its subdomains) and refuses the rest.

$vet-skills run --secrets RATIONALBLOKS_API_KEY=rationalbloks.com -- uvx rationalbloks-mcp

Never paste a credential into a chat, a ticket or a report, including ours. How the guard holds it.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (2 scenarios; not started: dependency install failed; the server itself was not observed) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 91/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 2 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.1sprocessdependency install exit 1 ·
0.1sclaimednot started: dependency install failed (exit 1); the server itself was not observed
0.1sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.1sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

MEDIUM
MCP server using network transport (SSE/HTTP)src/rationalbloks_mcp/backend/tools.py:1713 · MCP server using network transport (SSE/HTTP) — data sent over networkreturn BackendMCPServer(api_key=api_key, http_mode=http_mode)Fix: Namespace tool names and keep tool descriptions literal; no instructions to the agent inside them.
AST04

No other findings across 3,539 lines in 14 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈79 tok
1 file · 14 in bundle
Tool list per prompt
≈0 tok
0 tools · 0 per tool
Handshake
no reply
launch to tools/list, stdio
Undocumented tools
0
description under 20 chars · avg 0

Tokens estimated at four characters each. The tool list is re-read by the agent on every turn, so it is the number to compare between servers that do the same job: ranked across the index.

Known vulnerabilities

No advisories in OSV for rationalbloks-mcp@0.16.2 as of 15 h ago. This is the package itself, not its dependencies.

rationalbloks-mcp@0.16.2 safety verdict: Verified (not started) — KillerSkills