Skills/PyPI/prometheus-mcp

prometheus-mcp@0.5.1

VERIFIED· not started

Publisher claims: "MCP server for Prometheus and Alertmanager — query metrics, inspect alerts, explore targets, check cardinality, and investigate incidents (read-only)." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry PyPI (MCP server)Publisher mshegolev · publishing for 211 daysInstalls 336Last detonated 1 h ago
$claude mcp add prometheus-mcp -- uvx prometheus-mcp
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Not started: dependency install failed; the server itself was not observed.
Tested
the dependency install step · every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
server startup · the tool list · tool behavior

What this means for the label: Verified here covers what ran. The server's tools were not exercised with a real credential, so nothing about their behavior is asserted; the credential summary below says what to do with that.

Before you give it your token

It will ask for
ALERTMANAGER_PASSWORDALERTMANAGER_TOKENPROMETHEUS_PASSWORDPROMETHEUS_TOKENConfiguration, not credentials: ALERTMANAGER_SSL_VERIFY, ALERTMANAGER_URL, ALERTMANAGER_USERNAME, PROMETHEUS_CACHE_TTL, PROMETHEUS_MAX_RESPONSE_BYTES, PROMETHEUS_MCP_CONFIG, PROMETHEUS_SSL_VERIFY, PROMETHEUS_TIMEOUT, PROMETHEUS_URL, PROMETHEUS_USERNAME
Where it talks to
no vendor host named in the codeAlso jsonlint.com, pydantic.dev — not the publisher's domain; check what for before connecting.
What the honeypot saw
no credential files read · no network
What we could not test
server startup · the tool list · tool behavior

Connect it with a scoped credential, under the guard, and read the third-party hosts first. The code names jsonlint.com, pydantic.dev as well as its own vendor. The guard injects ALERTMANAGER_PASSWORD, ALERTMANAGER_TOKEN, PROMETHEUS_PASSWORD, PROMETHEUS_TOKEN only into requests to the host you bind (and its subdomains) and refuses the rest.

$vet-skills run --net declared -- uvx prometheus-mcp

Never paste a credential into a chat, a ticket or a report, including ours. How the guard holds it.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (2 scenarios; not started: dependency install failed; the server itself was not observed) on 2026-11-15 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 2 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.1sprocessdependency install exit 1 ·
0.1sclaimednot started: dependency install failed (exit 1); the server itself was not observed
0.2sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.2sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

MEDIUM
Python subprocess execution detectedtests/test_version_sync.py:31 · Python subprocess execution detectedreturn subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST05

No other findings across 21,975 lines in 81 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈75 tok
1 file · 81 in bundle
Tool list per prompt
≈0 tok
0 tools · 0 per tool
Handshake
no reply
launch to tools/list, stdio
Undocumented tools
0
description under 20 chars · avg 0

Tokens estimated at four characters each. The tool list is re-read by the agent on every turn, so it is the number to compare between servers that do the same job: ranked across the index.

Known vulnerabilities

No advisories in OSV for prometheus-mcp@0.5.1 as of 35 min ago. This is the package itself, not its dependencies.