Skills/PyPI/parcelapp-mcp

parcelapp-mcp@0.2.1

VERIFIED· not started

Publisher claims: "MCP server for the Parcel delivery tracking app: read and add deliveries over stdio or HTTP" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry PyPI (MCP server)Publisher obeone · publishing for 149 daysInstalls 125Last detonated 3 h ago
$claude mcp add parcelapp-mcp -- uvx parcelapp-mcp
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Not started: dependency install failed; the server itself was not observed.
Tested
the dependency install step · every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
server startup · the tool list · tool behavior

What this means for the label: Verified here covers what ran. The server's tools were not exercised with a real credential, so nothing about their behavior is asserted; the credential summary below says what to do with that.

Before you give it your token

It will ask for
PARCEL_API_KEYPARCEL_TOKENConfiguration, not credentials: PARCEL_HOST, PARCEL_LOG_LEVEL, PARCEL_MCP_URL, PARCEL_PATH, PARCEL_PORT, PARCEL_TRANSPORT
Where it talks to
parcelapp.net (its own)Also parcel.app — not the publisher's domain; check what for before connecting.
What the honeypot saw
no credential files read · no network
What we could not test
server startup · the tool list · tool behavior

Connect it with a scoped credential, under the guard, and read the third-party hosts first. The code names parcel.app as well as its own vendor. The guard injects PARCEL_API_KEY, PARCEL_TOKEN only into requests to parcelapp.net (and its subdomains) and refuses the rest.

$vet-skills run --secrets PARCEL_API_KEY=parcelapp.net,PARCEL_TOKEN=parcelapp.net -- uvx parcelapp-mcp

Never paste a credential into a chat, a ticket or a report, including ours. How the guard holds it.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (2 scenarios; not started: dependency install failed; the server itself was not observed) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 91/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 2 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.1sprocessdependency install exit 1 ·
0.1sclaimednot started: dependency install failed (exit 1); the server itself was not observed
0.1sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.1sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

LOW
Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction filesCHANGELOG.md:24 · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files · informational: not an instruction file- Add CLAUDE.md with architecture and rate-limit invariantsFix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01
MEDIUM
File permission modification commandDockerfile:38 · File permission modification command — agent changes file ownership/permissionsRUN chown app:app /appFix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.
AST05
MEDIUM
File permission modification commandDockerfile:14 · File permission modification command — agent changes file ownership/permissions# Created first: a --chown naming a user this stage does not know yet isFix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.
AST05

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈2,521 tok
2 files · 24 in bundle
Tool list per prompt
≈0 tok
0 tools · 0 per tool
Handshake
no reply
launch to tools/list, stdio
Undocumented tools
0
description under 20 chars · avg 0

Tokens estimated at four characters each. The tool list is re-read by the agent on every turn, so it is the number to compare between servers that do the same job: ranked across the index.

Known vulnerabilities

No advisories in OSV for parcelapp-mcp@0.2.1 as of 3 h ago. This is the package itself, not its dependencies.