Skills/PyPI/onem2m-mcp

onem2m-mcp@0.4.1

VERIFIED· not started

Publisher claims: "Expose a oneM2M CSE to AI agents via the Model Context Protocol (MCP)" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry PyPI (MCP server)Publisher rostanai · publishing for 101 daysInstalls 87Last detonated 22 h ago
$claude mcp add onem2m-mcp -- uvx onem2m-mcp
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Not started: dependency install failed; the server itself was not observed.
Tested
the dependency install step · every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
server startup · the tool list · tool behavior

What this means for the label: Verified here covers what ran. The server's tools were not exercised with a real credential, so nothing about their behavior is asserted; the credential summary below says what to do with that.

Before you give it your token

It will ask for
ACME_MCP_AUTH_TOKENACME_MCP_AUTH_TOKENSACME_MCP_OAUTH_AUDIENCEACME_MCP_OAUTH_ISSUERACME_MCP_OAUTH_JWKS_URLMCP_TEST_TOKENConfiguration, not credentials: ACME_MCP_CSE_ADMIN, ACME_MCP_CSE_RN, ACME_MCP_CSE_URL, ACME_MCP_HOST, ACME_MCP_ORIGINATOR, ACME_MCP_ORIGINATOR_MAP, ACME_MCP_PORT, ACME_MCP_RVI, ACME_MCP_TLS_CERT, ACME_MCP_TLS_KEY
Where it talks to
no vendor host named in the codeAlso etsi.org, example.org, acmecse.net — not the publisher's domain; check what for before connecting.
What the honeypot saw
no credential files read · no network
What we could not test
server startup · the tool list · tool behavior

Connect it with a scoped credential, under the guard, and read the third-party hosts first. The code names etsi.org, example.org, acmecse.net as well as its own vendor. The guard injects ACME_MCP_AUTH_TOKEN, ACME_MCP_AUTH_TOKENS, ACME_MCP_OAUTH_AUDIENCE, ACME_MCP_OAUTH_ISSUER, ACME_MCP_OAUTH_JWKS_URL, MCP_TEST_TOKEN only into requests to the host you bind (and its subdomains) and refuses the rest.

$vet-skills run --net declared -- uvx onem2m-mcp

Never paste a credential into a chat, a ticket or a report, including ours. How the guard holds it.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (2 scenarios; not started: dependency install failed; the server itself was not observed) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 2 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.1sprocessdependency install exit 1 ·
0.1sclaimednot started: dependency install failed (exit 1); the server itself was not observed
0.1sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.1sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

LOW
Authorization escalation languageREADME.md:482 · Authorization escalation language · informational: not an instruction fileAdmin access is never used for tool calls; set `ACME_MCP_ORIGINATOR` to use a customFix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01

No other findings across 4,835 lines in 28 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈53 tok
1 file · 28 in bundle
Tool list per prompt
≈0 tok
0 tools · 0 per tool
Handshake
no reply
launch to tools/list, stdio
Undocumented tools
0
description under 20 chars · avg 0

Tokens estimated at four characters each. The tool list is re-read by the agent on every turn, so it is the number to compare between servers that do the same job: ranked across the index.

Known vulnerabilities

No advisories in OSV for onem2m-mcp@0.4.1 as of 21 h ago. This is the package itself, not its dependencies.

onem2m-mcp@0.4.1 safety verdict: Verified (not started) — KillerSkills