oceanum-mcp@0.6.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "MCP servers for the Oceanum platform" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Before you give it your token
- It will ask for
DATAMESH_TOKENDATAMESH_TOKEN_FILEOCEANUM_MCP_AUTHOCEANUM_MCP_AUTH0_AUDIENCEOCEANUM_MCP_AUTH0_DOMAINConfiguration, not credentials: DATAMESH_SERVICE, FASTMCP_LOG_LEVEL, OCEANUM_DOMAIN, OCEANUM_MCP_CORS_ORIGINS, OCEANUM_MCP_EXPORT_DIR, OCEANUM_MCP_MAX_INLINE_BYTES, OCEANUM_MCP_MAX_INLINE_ROWS, OCEANUM_MCP_PUBLIC_URL, OCEANUM_MCP_STAGE_TIMEOUT, STORAGE_SERVICE- Where it talks to
- oceanum.io (its own)Also evil.com, vscode.dev — not the publisher's domain; check what for before connecting.
- What the honeypot saw
- nothing has run yet
- What we could not test
- everything: the server has not run yet
Run it before you trust it. Nothing has run yet: the code was read, the server was not. `vet-skills try` runs this exact version in the honeypot in about a minute.
Never paste a credential into a chat, a ticket or a report, including ours. How the guard holds it.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 66/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
self.proc = subprocess.Popen(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.f"chmod 600 {path}"Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.result = subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.proc = subprocess.Popen(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="chmod 600") as exc:Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.result = subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.token_file.write_bytes("file-token\r\n".encode())Fix: Keep SKILL.md to visible, descriptive text. Remove comments and encoded text that address the agent.result = subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
No advisories in OSV for oceanum-mcp@0.6.0 as of 25 h ago. This is the package itself, not its dependencies.
What would make this Verified
14 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim pypi: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
- File permission modification command≈ +2 on the totalRequest the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.
- Hidden zero-width characters detected≈ +2 on the totalKeep SKILL.md to visible, descriptive text. Remove comments and encoded text that address the agent.