Skills/PyPI/noctua-mcp

noctua-mcp@0.2.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "MCP server for Barista to control Noctua editing" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry PyPI (MCP server)Publisher my-name-my-name · publishing for 408 daysInstalls 65Last detonated 32 h ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Before you give it your token

It will ask for
BARISTA_TOKEN
Where it talks to
no vendor host named in the codeAlso berkeleybop.org, geneontology.org, orcid.org, wormbase.org — not the publisher's domain; check what for before connecting.
What the honeypot saw
nothing has run yet
What we could not test
everything: the server has not run yet

Run it before you trust it. Nothing has run yet: the code was read, the server was not. `vet-skills try` runs this exact version in the honeypot in about a minute.

Never paste a credential into a chat, a ticket or a report, including ours. How the guard holds it.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 65/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
File type combined with upload action.github/actions/claude-code-action/action.yml:154 · File type combined with upload action — agent may exfiltrate local data filesjq -s '.' output.txt > output.jsonFix: Remove the call, or declare the host in frontmatter and explain in the README what is sent and why.
AST07
LOW
Fake instruction boundary tag.github/actions/claude-issue-summarize-action/action.yml:50 · Fake instruction boundary tag · informational: not an instruction file- If you want a more powerful AI agent to take on this one and make a PR, use this magic phrase: `@dragon-ai-agent please <INSTRUCTIONS>`Fix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01
MEDIUM
File type combined with upload action.github/actions/claude-code-action/action.yml:157 · File type combined with upload action — agent may exfiltrate local data filesjq -r '.[-1].result' output.json > "${{ inputs.output_file }}"Fix: Remove the call, or declare the host in frontmatter and explain in the README what is sent and why.
AST07
MEDIUM
File type combined with upload action.github/actions/claude-code-action/action.yml:159 · File type combined with upload action — agent may exfiltrate local data filesecho "Complete output saved to output.json, final response saved to ${{ inputs.output_file }}"Fix: Remove the call, or declare the host in frontmatter and explain in the README what is sent and why.
AST07
MEDIUM
Pipe-to-shell pattern.github/actions/claude-code-action/action.yml:50 · Pipe-to-shell pattern — downloads and immediately executes remote codecurl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | shFix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST06
MEDIUM
Remote installer piped to shell.github/actions/claude-code-action/action.yml:50 · Remote installer piped to shellcurl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | shFix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST07

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,415 tok
4 files · 60 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

No advisories in OSV for noctua-mcp@0.2.0 as of 31 h ago. This is the package itself, not its dependencies.

What would make this Verified

15 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim my-name-my-name: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. File type combined with upload action≈ +2 on the totalRemove the call, or declare the host in frontmatter and explain in the README what is sent and why.
  3. Pipe-to-shell pattern≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
  4. Remote installer piped to shell≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
Publish a new version to PyPI, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim my-name-my-namePropose a patch to the maintainer