Skills/PyPI/nexatron-mcp

nexatron-mcp@1.0.3

VERIFIED· not started

Publisher claims: "Nexatron MCP server — governed enterprise-data access for Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, and any MCP-compatible AI client. Exposes 12 tools (query, list_connections, get_schema, list_metrics, list_views, search_knowledge_base, detect_schema_drift, test_connection, list_conversations, get_report, get_credit_balance, whoami) and 1 resource (nexatron://platform/info) over the Nexatron REST API with per-tenant isolation and cryptographic audit." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry PyPI (MCP server)Publisher dotsolved-inc-info · publishing for 145 daysInstalls 451Last detonated 33 h ago
$claude mcp add nexatron-mcp -- uvx nexatron-mcp
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Not started: dependency install failed; the server itself was not observed.
Tested
the dependency install step · every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
server startup · the tool list · tool behavior

What this means for the label: Verified here covers what ran. The server's tools were not exercised with a real credential, so nothing about their behavior is asserted; the credential summary below says what to do with that.

Before you give it your token

It will ask for
NEXATRON_API_KEYConfiguration, not credentials: NEXATRON_URL
Where it talks to
nexatron.io (its own)
What the honeypot saw
no credential files read · no network
What we could not test
server startup · the tool list · tool behavior

Connect it with a scoped credential, under the guard. It asks for NEXATRON_API_KEY and talks to nexatron.io. Give the credential to the guard, not the server: the value never enters the server's environment and only travels to the host you bind. What the tools do with a real credential was not observed.

$vet-skills run --secrets NEXATRON_API_KEY=nexatron.io -- uvx nexatron-mcp

Never paste a credential into a chat, a ticket or a report, including ours. How the guard holds it.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (2 scenarios; not started: dependency install failed; the server itself was not observed) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 89/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 2 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.1sprocessdependency install exit 1 ·
0.1sclaimednot started: dependency install failed (exit 1); the server itself was not observed
0.1sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.1sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

HIGH
Credential pass-through configurationsrc/nexatron_mcp/client.py:58 · Credential pass-through configuration — agent relays sensitive credentials"Set NEXATRON_API_KEY environment variable or pass api_key parameter.\n"Fix: Stop enumerating or reading credential locations; take secrets from a declared environment variable the user sets on purpose.
AST02

No other findings across 3,023 lines in 13 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈154 tok
1 file · 13 in bundle
Tool list per prompt
≈0 tok
0 tools · 0 per tool
Handshake
no reply
launch to tools/list, stdio
Undocumented tools
0
description under 20 chars · avg 0

Tokens estimated at four characters each. The tool list is re-read by the agent on every turn, so it is the number to compare between servers that do the same job: ranked across the index.

Known vulnerabilities

No advisories in OSV for nexatron-mcp@1.0.3 as of 31 h ago. This is the package itself, not its dependencies.

nexatron-mcp@1.0.3 safety verdict: Verified (not started) — KillerSkills