Propose a patch
A fix the maintainer can act on, with the evidence attached. It opens under your GitHub account in your browser; KillerSkills holds no token and never modifies the package. The fix is verified the only way we verify anything: the next crawl re-runs the new version in the honeypot. 68 · Caution
Evidence
The sandbox observed nothing beyond the static findings; the proposal cites those.
Diff · removes 5 caught lines
Download .patchdiff --git a/src/netexec_mcp/modules/ldap.py b/src/netexec_mcp/modules/ldap.py --- a/src/netexec_mcp/modules/ldap.py +++ b/src/netexec_mcp/modules/ldap.py @@ -181,1 +181,0 @@ -Reports OS/domain and the auth result (`[+]`/`[-]`). Pass credentials to bind, diff --git a/src/netexec_mcp/modules/rdp.py b/src/netexec_mcp/modules/rdp.py --- a/src/netexec_mcp/modules/rdp.py +++ b/src/netexec_mcp/modules/rdp.py @@ -122,1 +122,0 @@ -the auth result (`[+]`, with `Pwn3d!` when the account can log in). Pass credentials diff --git a/src/netexec_mcp/modules/mssql.py b/src/netexec_mcp/modules/mssql.py --- a/src/netexec_mcp/modules/mssql.py +++ b/src/netexec_mcp/modules/mssql.py @@ -146,1 +146,0 @@ -role). Pass credentials to authenticate, or none to fingerprint the service. diff --git a/src/netexec_mcp/modules/winrm.py b/src/netexec_mcp/modules/winrm.py --- a/src/netexec_mcp/modules/winrm.py +++ b/src/netexec_mcp/modules/winrm.py @@ -104,1 +104,0 @@ -open a remote shell). Pass credentials to authenticate, or none to probe whether diff --git a/src/netexec_mcp/modules/wmi.py b/src/netexec_mcp/modules/wmi.py --- a/src/netexec_mcp/modules/wmi.py +++ b/src/netexec_mcp/modules/wmi.py @@ -116,1 +116,0 @@ -account is a local admin). Pass credentials to authenticate, or none to fingerprint
Zero-context hunks: apply with git apply --unidiff-zero fix.patch on the tagged source of 1.0.10. If the behavior is intended, declare it (host under permissions.network, a line in the README) instead of removing it; the next crawl scores declarations.
Issue / PR body
Title: netexec-mcp: Credential pass-through configuration (KillerSkills verdict caution 68)
## What the honeypot observed KillerSkills ran **[email protected]** in an isolated sandbox (decoy credentials, recording proxy, syscall trace; engine 1.8.1) and scored it **CAUTION 68/100**. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory. - See the findings below. Full trace and findings: https://killerskills.ai/skills/pypi/netexec-mcp/1.0.10 ## Findings with a location - `src/netexec_mcp/modules/ldap.py:181` · Credential pass-through configuration — src/netexec_mcp/modules/ldap.py:181 · Credential pass-through configuration — agent relays sensitive credentials - `src/netexec_mcp/modules/rdp.py:122` · Credential pass-through configuration — src/netexec_mcp/modules/rdp.py:122 · Credential pass-through configuration — agent relays sensitive credentials - `src/netexec_mcp/modules/mssql.py:146` · Credential pass-through configuration — src/netexec_mcp/modules/mssql.py:146 · Credential pass-through configuration — agent relays sensitive credentials - `src/netexec_mcp/modules/winrm.py:104` · Credential pass-through configuration — src/netexec_mcp/modules/winrm.py:104 · Credential pass-through configuration — agent relays sensitive credentials - `src/netexec_mcp/modules/wmi.py:116` · Credential pass-through configuration — src/netexec_mcp/modules/wmi.py:116 · Credential pass-through configuration — agent relays sensitive credentials ## Proposed change The attached patch removes the 5 lines above. If the behavior is intended, the fix is to declare it instead: list the host under `permissions.network` (or the MCP manifest) and say in the README why the package needs it; the next crawl will re-score it with the declaration taken into account. ## How this will be verified Nothing is "verified safe" by assertion. When a new version is published, KillerSkills re-runs it in the honeypot and the verdict page updates; you can trigger it early from the verdict page ("Re-scan after I publish a fix"). Reply here or at [email protected] if you believe the verdict is wrong; disputes are reviewed by a person and the outcome is published on the verdict page. _Proposed through killerskills.ai/threats by a user of the package, under their own GitHub account. The evidence is public; the package was never modified by KillerSkills._
# or from a terminal, under your own account: gh repo fork mpgn/netexec-mcp --clone && cd netexec-mcp curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/pypi/netexec-mcp/1.0.10/patch.diff | git apply --unidiff-zero git checkout -b killerskills/1.0.10 && git commit -am "netexec-mcp: Credential pass-through configuration" gh pr create --fill --body-file <(curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/pypi/netexec-mcp/1.0.10/patch.md)
We count proposals opened, not merged: a merge shows up as a new version that the crawl re-runs. Disputes: the maintainer can contest the verdict from its page; a person reviews it and the outcome is published.