Skills/PyPI/mseep-synapse-mcp

mseep-synapse-mcp@0.1.4

VERIFIED· not started

Publisher claims: "A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that exposes Synapse Entities with Croissant metadata support" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry PyPI (MCP server)Publisher sagebionetworks · publishing for 577 daysInstalls 16Last detonated 44 h ago
$claude mcp add mseep-synapse-mcp -- uvx mseep-synapse-mcp
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Not started: dependency install failed; the server itself was not observed.
Tested
install scripts, with decoy credentials in place · second launch with the clock 45 days ahead · the dependency install step · every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
server startup · the tool list · tool behavior

What this means for the label: Verified here covers what ran. The server's tools were not exercised with a real credential, so nothing about their behavior is asserted; the credential summary below says what to do with that.

Before you give it your token

It will ask for
SYNAPSE_OAUTH_CLIENT_IDSYNAPSE_OAUTH_CLIENT_SECRETSYNAPSE_OAUTH_REDIRECT_URIConfiguration, not credentials: MCP_SERVER_URL, MCP_TRANSPORT
Where it talks to
no vendor host named in the codeAlso sagebase.org, purl.org, synapse.org, creativecommons.org, sagebionetworks.org — not the publisher's domain; check what for before connecting.
What the honeypot saw
no credential files read · no network
What we could not test
server startup · the tool list · tool behavior

Connect it with a scoped credential, under the guard, and read the third-party hosts first. The code names sagebase.org, purl.org, synapse.org, creativecommons.org, sagebionetworks.org as well as its own vendor. The guard injects SYNAPSE_OAUTH_CLIENT_ID, SYNAPSE_OAUTH_CLIENT_SECRET, SYNAPSE_OAUTH_REDIRECT_URI only into requests to the host you bind (and its subdomains) and refuses the rest.

$vet-skills run --net declared -- uvx mseep-synapse-mcp

Never paste a credential into a chat, a ticket or a report, including ours. How the guard holds it.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (3 scenarios; not started: dependency install failed; the server itself was not observed) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 3 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessexited 1: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'setuptools'
0.1sprocessdependency install exit 1 ·
0.1sclaimednot started: dependency install failed (exit 1); the server itself was not observed
0.2sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.2sprocesssecond launch, clock +45 days, CI unset
0.2sprocessexited 1: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'setuptools'

Static findings

No findings across 2,889 lines in 35 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈64 tok
1 file · 35 in bundle
Tool list per prompt
≈0 tok
0 tools · 0 per tool
Handshake
no reply
launch to tools/list, stdio
Undocumented tools
0
description under 20 chars · avg 0

Tokens estimated at four characters each. The tool list is re-read by the agent on every turn, so it is the number to compare between servers that do the same job: ranked across the index.

Known vulnerabilities

No advisories in OSV for mseep-synapse-mcp@0.1.4 as of 44 h ago. This is the package itself, not its dependencies.