Skills/PyPI/mcp-tarzan-base

mcp-tarzan-base@0.4.0

VERIFIED· not started

Publisher claims: "Tarzan base API MCP server" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry PyPI (MCP server)Publisher zheng-892673459 · publishing for 157 daysInstalls 41Last detonated 5d ago
$claude mcp add mcp-tarzan-base -- uvx mcp-tarzan-base
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Not started: dependency install failed; the server itself was not observed.
Tested
the dependency install step · every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
server startup · the tool list · tool behavior

What this means for the label: Verified here covers what ran. The server's tools were not exercised with a real credential, so nothing about their behavior is asserted; the credential summary below says what to do with that.

Before you give it your token

It will ask for
OAUTH_CLIENT_IDOAUTH_CLIENT_SECRETOAUTH_GRANT_TYPEOAUTH_PASSWORDOAUTH_USERNAMEConfiguration, not credentials: API_TIMEOUT, SYSTEM_API_URL, TARZAN_BASE, TENANT_ID
Where it talks to
no vendor host named in the code
What the honeypot saw
no credential files read · no network
What we could not test
server startup · the tool list · tool behavior

Connect it with a scoped credential, under the guard. It asks for OAUTH_CLIENT_ID, OAUTH_CLIENT_SECRET, OAUTH_GRANT_TYPE, OAUTH_PASSWORD, OAUTH_USERNAME and talks to its vendor. Give the credential to the guard, not the server: the value never enters the server's environment and only travels to the host you bind. What the tools do with a real credential was not observed.

$vet-skills run --net declared -- uvx mcp-tarzan-base

Never paste a credential into a chat, a ticket or a report, including ours. How the guard holds it.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (2 scenarios; not started: dependency install failed; the server itself was not observed) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 2 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.1sprocessdependency install exit 1 ·
0.1sclaimednot started: dependency install failed (exit 1); the server itself was not observed
0.1sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.1sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 946 lines in 10 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈44 tok
1 file · 10 in bundle
Tool list per prompt
≈0 tok
0 tools · 0 per tool
Handshake
no reply
launch to tools/list, stdio
Undocumented tools
0
description under 20 chars · avg 0

Tokens estimated at four characters each. The tool list is re-read by the agent on every turn, so it is the number to compare between servers that do the same job: ranked across the index.

Known vulnerabilities

No advisories in OSV for mcp-tarzan-base@0.4.0 as of 5d ago. This is the package itself, not its dependencies.

mcp-tarzan-base@0.4.0 safety verdict: Verified (not started) — KillerSkills