Skills/PyPI/mcp-coded-tools

mcp-coded-tools@0.1.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Generate discoverable code from MCP servers for agent tool usage" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry PyPI (MCP server)Publisher bluman1 · publishing for 373 daysInstalls 8Last detonated 7d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Before you give it your token

Code inventory arrives with this version's next honeypot run.
It will ask for
unknown until the next run
Where it talks to
unknown until the next run
What the honeypot saw
nothing has run yet
What we could not test
everything: the server has not run yet

Run it before you trust it. Nothing has run yet: the code was read, the server was not. `vet-skills try` runs this exact version in the honeypot in about a minute.

Never paste a credential into a chat, a ticket or a report, including ours. How the guard holds it.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
npx invocation of non-well-known packagesrc/mcp_coded_tools/cli.py:263 · npx invocation of non-well-known package — may execute untrusted codehelp='MCP server command. Example: "npx -y @modelcontextprotocol/server-gdrive"',Fix: Pin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
AST06
MEDIUM
npx invocation of non-well-known packagesrc/mcp_coded_tools/cli.py:90 · npx invocation of non-well-known package — may execute untrusted code-c "npx -y @modelcontextprotocol/server-gdrive" \\Fix: Pin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
AST06
MEDIUM
npx invocation of non-well-known packagesrc/mcp_coded_tools/cli.py:46 · npx invocation of non-well-known package — may execute untrusted codehelp='MCP server command (can be specified multiple times). Example: -c "npx -y @modelcontextprotocol/server-gdrive"',Fix: Pin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
AST06
MEDIUM
npx invocation of non-well-known packagesrc/mcp_coded_tools/cli.py:86 · npx invocation of non-well-known package — may execute untrusted codemcp-coded-tools generate -c "npx -y @modelcontextprotocol/server-gdrive" -o ./serversFix: Pin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
AST06
MEDIUM
npx invocation of non-well-known packagesrc/mcp_coded_tools/cli.py:271 · npx invocation of non-well-known package — may execute untrusted codemcp-coded-tools inspect -c "npx -y @modelcontextprotocol/server-gdrive"Fix: Pin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
AST06

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈54 tok
1 file · 20 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

No advisories in OSV for mcp-coded-tools@0.1.0 as of 7d ago. This is the package itself, not its dependencies.

What would make this Verified

11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim bluman1: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +2 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
Publish a new version to PyPI, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim bluman1Propose a patch to the maintainer