sloplint@0.2.0
VERIFIED· install onlyPublisher claims: "Catch the phrases that make writing read like unedited AI output. Offline, deterministic, with a shareable slop score." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Coverage
Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.- Tested
- every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
- Not tested
- use of the skill by an agent
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 92/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Behavior trace
Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviationsStatic findings
…odel kan ik"] ] }, { code: "ru", why: "\u042D\u0442\u043E\u0442 \u0448\u0430\u0431\u043B\u043E\u043D\u043D\u044B\u0439 \u043E\u0431\u043E\u0440\u043E\u0442 \u043E\u0442\u043A\u043B\u0430\u0434\u044B…Fix: Put hosts, commands and strings in plain source. Decoding at runtime looks identical to malware and costs points on its own.No other findings across 3,306 lines in 8 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
No advisories in OSV for @kcgdz/sloplint@0.2.0 as of 6d ago. This is the package itself, not its dependencies.