operations-council@1.0.0
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "Solo-operator operability review (Operator, Support Desk, Process Auditor, Foreman). Verdict: OPERABLE / FIX FIRST / NOT OPERABLE. Claude Code skill." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-27 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: Fake instruction boundary tag. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No other findings across 486 lines in 5 files.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim ojesusmp: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.