mcp@2.5.1

VERIFIED

Publisher claims: "A Model Context Protocol Server for One" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry npm (MCP server) · listed in the official MCP RegistryPublisher withone · publishing for 239 daysInstalls 2,166Last detonated 3d ago
$claude mcp add mcp -- npx -y @withone/mcp
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Started with a decoy ONE_SECRET; tool list observed. Tool calls with a real credential not tested.
Tested
server startup with a tagged decoy in ONE_SECRET · MCP initialize and tools/list · every tool description, for hidden instructions · where the decoy credential went · every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
what the tools do when called with a real credential
Needs
ONE_SECRET — give it to the server where it runs, through vet-skills run --secrets, so the value never enters the server's environment. Never paste a credential into a chat, a ticket or a report.

Before you give it your token

It will ask for
ONE_SECRETConfiguration, not credentials: ONE_ACTION_IDS, ONE_APPROVAL, ONE_BASE_URL, ONE_CONNECTION_KEYS, ONE_IDENTITY, ONE_IDENTITY_TYPE, ONE_KNOWLEDGE_AGENT, ONE_PERMISSIONS
Where it talks to
withone.ai (its own)Also nodejs.org, some-vendor-api.com — not the publisher's domain; check what for before connecting.
What the honeypot saw
no credential files read · no network
What we could not test
what the tools do when called with a real credential

Connect it with a scoped credential, under the guard, and read the third-party hosts first. The code names nodejs.org, some-vendor-api.com as well as its own vendor. The guard injects ONE_SECRET only into requests to withone.ai (and its subdomains) and refuses the rest.

$vet-skills run --secrets ONE_SECRET=withone.ai -- npx -y @withone/mcp

Never paste a credential into a chat, a ticket or a report, including ours. How the guard holds it.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (2 scenarios) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 95/100 (Verified). It did what it claims and nothing else we could detect: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 46 s · 2 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
5.7sprocessdependency install exit 0
26sprocessrelaunched with a decoy ONE_SECRET (tagged; nothing real)
46sclaimed3 tools with a decoy ONE_SECRET: list_one_integrations, find_one_actions, execute_one_action
46sprocessscript backend runs setup only
46sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 4,084 lines in 25 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈43 tok
1 file · 25 in bundle
Tool list per prompt
≈1,388 tok
3 tools · 463 per tool
Handshake
692 ms
launch to tools/list, stdio
Undocumented tools
0
description under 20 chars · avg 574

Tokens estimated at four characters each. The tool list is re-read by the agent on every turn, so it is the number to compare between servers that do the same job: ranked across the index.

Known vulnerabilities

No advisories in OSV for @withone/mcp@2.5.1 as of 3d ago. This is the package itself, not its dependencies.