Skills/Glama/supermap-gis-bridge

supermap-gis-bridge@r1

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "Glama Dockerfile for YUYU20061107/supermap-gis-bridge 使用方式：在 Glama 该 listing 的 Admin -> Dockerfile 页面直接粘贴本文件内容 （awesome-mcp-servers 机器人要求 "add Dockerfile directly to Glama"）。 构建上下文为仓库根目录。 为什么这么小就够：live/mcp_server.py 是纯 Python 标准库手写 stdio MCP 服务端（仅 import io/json/os/socket/subprocess/sys/time），无任何第三方 依赖、无 requirements.txt。initialize / tools/list / ping 全部由静态 TOOL_DEFS 在本地应答，不需要 Su" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry GlamaPublisher yuyu20061107 · publishing for 1 daysInstalls 0Last detonated 23 h ago
$npx skills add supermap-gis-bridge
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

What this means for the label: Verified here covers what ran. The server's tools were not exercised with a real credential, so nothing about their behavior is asserted; the credential summary below says what to do with that.

Before you give it your token

It will ask for
SM_BRIDGE_TOKENSM_BRIDGE_TOKEN_FILEConfiguration, not credentials: SM_BRIDGE_AUTOSTART, SM_BRIDGE_AUTOSTART_PYTHON, SM_BRIDGE_AUTOSTART_WORKSPACE, SM_BRIDGE_HOST, SM_BRIDGE_LOG_FILE, SM_BRIDGE_PORT, SM_LIVE_WORKSPACE_PATH
Where it talks to
no vendor host named in the code
What the honeypot saw
no credential files read · no network
What we could not test
use of the skill by an agent

Connect it with a scoped credential, under the guard. It asks for SM_BRIDGE_TOKEN, SM_BRIDGE_TOKEN_FILE and talks to its vendor. Give the credential to the guard, not the server: the value never enters the server's environment and only travels to the host you bind. What the tools do with a real credential was not observed.

$vet-skills run --net declared -- <the server's command>

Never paste a credential into a chat, a ticket or a report, including ours. How the guard holds it.

Is supermap-gis-bridge@r1 safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 90/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

MEDIUM
Python subprocess execution detectedlive/selftest.py:134 · Python subprocess execution detectedbridge = subprocess.Popen([sys.executable, BRIDGE_PY],Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST05
MEDIUM
Python subprocess execution detectedlive/selftest.py:148 · Python subprocess execution detectedmcp = subprocess.Popen([sys.executable, MCP_PY],Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST05
MEDIUM
Python subprocess execution detectedlive/mcp_server.py:148 · Python subprocess execution detectedchild = subprocess.Popen([AUTOSTART_PYTHON, BRIDGE_SCRIPT, AUTOSTART_WORKSPACE],Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST05

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,089 tok
1 file · 24 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.