Skills/Glama/storylink-mcp

storylink-mcp@1.0.1

VERIFIED· startup only

Publisher claims: "Connects AI assistants to Storylink's Instagram analytics so users can ask about views, reach, engagement, follower change, and best or worst stories, posts and reels over 7/30/90-day or custom date ranges. With a Business write key it also schedules and manages stories, posts and reels." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry GlamaPublisher storylinkpro · publishing for 3 daysInstalls 0Last detonated 3d ago
$npx skills add storylink-mcp
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Startup only; authenticated tool behavior not tested.
Tested
server startup over stdio (initialize sent) · every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
the tool list (the server exited before answering) · what the tools do when called with real credentials
Needs
STORYLINK_API_KEY — give it to the server where it runs, through vet-skills run --secrets, so the value never enters the server's environment. Never paste a credential into a chat, a ticket or a report.

What this means for the label: Verified here covers what ran. The server's tools were not exercised with a real credential, so nothing about their behavior is asserted; the credential summary below says what to do with that.

Before you give it your token

It will ask for
STORYLINK_API_KEYConfiguration, not credentials: STORYLINK_MCP_URL
Where it talks to
storylink.pro (its own)
What the honeypot saw
no credential files read · no network
What we could not test
the tool list (the server exited before answering) · what the tools do when called with real credentials

Connect it with a scoped credential, under the guard. It asks for STORYLINK_API_KEY and talks to storylink.pro. Give the credential to the guard, not the server: the value never enters the server's environment and only travels to the host you bind. What the tools do with a real credential was not observed.

$vet-skills run --secrets STORYLINK_API_KEY=storylink.pro -- <the server's command>

Never paste a credential into a chat, a ticket or a report, including ours. How the guard holds it.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (2 scenarios; startup only; authenticated tool behavior not tested) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed (it asks for STORYLINK_API_KEY); the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 44 s · 2 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
4.2sprocessdependency install exit 0
24sprocessrelaunched with a decoy STORYLINK_API_KEY (tagged; nothing real)
44sclaimedstartup only: exited before answering, asking for STORYLINK_API_KEY (a decoy value was refused)
44sprocessscript backend runs setup only
44sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 2,297 lines in 12 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈38 tok
1 file · 12 in bundle
Tool list per prompt
≈0 tok
0 tools · 0 per tool
Handshake
no reply
launch to tools/list, stdio
Undocumented tools
0
description under 20 chars · avg 0

Tokens estimated at four characters each. The tool list is re-read by the agent on every turn, so it is the number to compare between servers that do the same job: ranked across the index.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.