Skills/Glama/roomba-mcp

roomba-mcp@0.1.0

VERIFIED· not started

Publisher claims: "Enables control and observation of a Roomba Combo j9+ through MCP, including mission commands, live status, settings, schedules, maps, history, and consumables over local LSS with cloud fallback." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry GlamaPublisher auss · publishing for 2 daysInstalls 0Last detonated 2d ago
$npx skills add roomba-mcp
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Not started: dependency install failed; the server itself was not observed.
Tested
the dependency install step · every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
server startup · the tool list · tool behavior

What this means for the label: Verified here covers what ran. The server's tools were not exercised with a real credential, so nothing about their behavior is asserted; the credential summary below says what to do with that.

Before you give it your token

It will ask for
ROOMBA_HTTP_TOKENConfiguration, not credentials: ROOMBA_CONFIG, ROOMBA_CONFIG_DIR
Where it talks to
no vendor host named in the codeAlso irobotapi.com, gigya.com — not the publisher's domain; check what for before connecting.
What the honeypot saw
no credential files read · no network
What we could not test
server startup · the tool list · tool behavior

Connect it with a scoped credential, under the guard, and read the third-party hosts first. The code names irobotapi.com, gigya.com as well as its own vendor. The guard injects ROOMBA_HTTP_TOKEN only into requests to the host you bind (and its subdomains) and refuses the rest.

$vet-skills run --net declared -- <the server's command>

Never paste a credential into a chat, a ticket or a report, including ours. How the guard holds it.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (2 scenarios; not started: dependency install failed; the server itself was not observed) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 91/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 2 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.1sprocessdependency install exit 1 ·
0.1sclaimednot started: dependency install failed (exit 1); the server itself was not observed
0.1sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.1sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

MEDIUM
Process kill commandsrc/roomba_mcp/transports/local.py:181 · Process kill command — agent can terminate processesexcept Exception: # never let a listener kill the MQTT threadFix: Build commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.
AST05

No other findings across 24,740 lines in 63 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈480 tok
2 files · 63 in bundle
Tool list per prompt
≈0 tok
0 tools · 0 per tool
Handshake
no reply
launch to tools/list, stdio
Undocumented tools
0
description under 20 chars · avg 0

Tokens estimated at four characters each. The tool list is re-read by the agent on every turn, so it is the number to compare between servers that do the same job: ranked across the index.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

roomba-mcp@0.1.0 safety verdict: Verified (not started) — KillerSkills