Skills/Glama/pii-safe-db-mcp

pii-safe-db-mcp@0.2.0

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "Enables LLMs to run read-only queries against MySQL and PostgreSQL while detecting and masking PII in columns, values, and JSON/text fields before results reach the model." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry GlamaPublisher aqibsidd · publishing for 6 daysInstalls 0Last detonated 6d ago
$npx skills add pii-safe-db-mcp
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

What this means for the label: Verified here covers what ran. The server's tools were not exercised with a real credential, so nothing about their behavior is asserted; the credential summary below says what to do with that.

Before you give it your token

It will ask for
DATABASE_URLDB_PASSWORDPII_TOKEN_SECRETConfiguration, not credentials: ALLOWED_TABLES, AUDIT_ACTOR, AUDIT_ENVIRONMENT, AUDIT_LOG, AUDIT_QUERY_SHAPE, DB_HOST, DB_NAME, DB_PORT, DB_SSL, DB_TYPE, DB_USER, DENIED_TABLES, MAX_ROWS, PII_ALLOW_COLUMNS, PII_BLOCKED_COLUMNS, PII_EXTRA_COLUMNS, PII_MASK_MODE, PII_POLICY, PII_POLICY_FILE, PII_SCAN_VALUES, POLICY_FAIL_CLOSED, QUERY_TIMEOUT_MS
Where it talks to
no vendor host named in the code
What the honeypot saw
no credential files read · no network
What we could not test
use of the skill by an agent

Connect it with a scoped credential, under the guard. It asks for DATABASE_URL, DB_PASSWORD, PII_TOKEN_SECRET and talks to its vendor. Give the credential to the guard, not the server: the value never enters the server's environment and only travels to the host you bind. What the tools do with a real credential was not observed.

$vet-skills run --net declared -- <the server's command>

Never paste a credential into a chat, a ticket or a report, including ours. How the guard holds it.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 89/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

MEDIUM
Access to sensitive file pathstest/pii.test.mjs:125 · Access to sensitive file paths — SSH keys, AWS credentials, env files, or system files"SELECT pg_read_file('/etc/passwd')",Fix: Stop enumerating or reading credential locations; take secrets from a declared environment variable the user sets on purpose.
AST05
MEDIUM
File permission modification commandpackage.json:7 · File permission modification command — agent changes file ownership/permissions"build": "tsc && chmod +x dist/index.js",Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.
AST05
MEDIUM
Access to sensitive file pathstest/pii.test.mjs:126 · Access to sensitive file paths — SSH keys, AWS credentials, env files, or system files"SELECT LOAD_FILE('/etc/passwd')",Fix: Stop enumerating or reading credential locations; take secrets from a declared environment variable the user sets on purpose.
AST05

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈38 tok
1 file · 22 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.