Propose a patch
A fix the maintainer can act on, with the evidence attached. It opens under your GitHub account in your browser; KillerSkills holds no token and never modifies the package. The fix is verified the only way we verify anything: the next crawl re-runs the new version in the honeypot. 79 · Caution
Evidence
The sandbox observed nothing beyond the static findings; the proposal cites those.
Diff · removes 4 caught lines
Download .patchdiff --git a/docs/upstream/pages/oauth2.md b/docs/upstream/pages/oauth2.md --- a/docs/upstream/pages/oauth2.md +++ b/docs/upstream/pages/oauth2.md @@ -156,1 +156,0 @@ -Your application sends a token request to the Google Authorization Server, receives an authorization code, exchanges the code for a token, and uses the token to @@ -184,1 +183,0 @@ -Your application sends a token request to the Google Authorization Server, receives an authorization code, exchanges the code for a token, and uses the token to @@ -202,1 +200,0 @@ -Your JS application sends a token request to the Google Authorization Server, receives a token, validates the token, and uses the token to call a Google API end @@ -260,1 +257,0 @@ -Your server application uses a JWT to request a token from the Google Authorization Server, then uses the token to call a Google API endpoint. No end-user is in
Zero-context hunks: apply with git apply --unidiff-zero fix.patch on the tagged source of 0.1.0. If the behavior is intended, declare it (host under permissions.network, a line in the README) instead of removing it; the next crawl scores declarations.
Issue / PR body
Title: google-mail: Image alt text carrying instructions (KillerSkills verdict caution 79)
## What the honeypot observed KillerSkills ran **[email protected]** in an isolated sandbox (decoy credentials, recording proxy, syscall trace; engine 1.8.1) and scored it **CAUTION 79/100**. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory. - See the findings below. Full trace and findings: https://killerskills.ai/skills/glama/google-mail/0.1.0 ## Findings with a location - `docs/upstream/pages/oauth2.md:156` · Image alt text carrying instructions — docs/upstream/pages/oauth2.md:156 · Image alt text carrying instructions - `docs/upstream/pages/oauth2.md:202` · Image alt text carrying instructions — docs/upstream/pages/oauth2.md:202 · Image alt text carrying instructions - `docs/upstream/pages/oauth2.md:260` · Image alt text carrying instructions — docs/upstream/pages/oauth2.md:260 · Image alt text carrying instructions - `docs/upstream/pages/oauth2.md:184` · Image alt text carrying instructions — docs/upstream/pages/oauth2.md:184 · Image alt text carrying instructions ## Proposed change The attached patch removes the 4 lines above. If the behavior is intended, the fix is to declare it instead: list the host under `permissions.network` (or the MCP manifest) and say in the README why the package needs it; the next crawl will re-score it with the declaration taken into account. ## How this will be verified Nothing is "verified safe" by assertion. When a new version is published, KillerSkills re-runs it in the honeypot and the verdict page updates; you can trigger it early from the verdict page ("Re-scan after I publish a fix"). Reply here or at [email protected] if you believe the verdict is wrong; disputes are reviewed by a person and the outcome is published on the verdict page. _Proposed through killerskills.ai/threats by a user of the package, under their own GitHub account. The evidence is public; the package was never modified by KillerSkills._
# or from a terminal, under your own account: gh repo fork xippios/sdk-google-mail --clone && cd sdk-google-mail curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/glama/google-mail/0.1.0/patch.diff | git apply --unidiff-zero git checkout -b killerskills/0.1.0 && git commit -am "google-mail: Image alt text carrying instructions" gh pr create --fill --body-file <(curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/glama/google-mail/0.1.0/patch.md)
We count proposals opened, not merged: a merge shows up as a new version that the crawl re-runs. Disputes: the maintainer can contest the verdict from its page; a person reviews it and the outcome is published.