browser-gateway@0.1.0
VERIFIED· install onlyPublisher claims: "Enables an AI agent to access the web through a single unified interface, routing requests across PinchTab, bb-browser, Agent Reach, and Playwright for DOM interaction, structured data extraction, session diagnostics, and custom scripts with hard timeouts and fail-closed safety gates." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Coverage
Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.- Tested
- every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
- Not tested
- use of the skill by an agent
What this means for the label: Verified here covers what ran. The server's tools were not exercised with a real credential, so nothing about their behavior is asserted; the credential summary below says what to do with that.
Before you give it your token
- It will ask for
BROWSER_GATEWAY_ALLOW_SESSION_AUTHConfiguration, not credentials: AGENT_REACH_BIN, BB_BROWSER_BIN, BB_SITES_DIR, BROWSER_GATEWAY_ALLOW_CUSTOM_SCRIPT, BROWSER_GATEWAY_LOG_FILE, BROWSER_GATEWAY_OUTPUT_DIR, BROWSER_GATEWAY_PYTHON, PINCHTAB_BIN, PLAYWRIGHT_BROWSERS_PATH- Where it talks to
- no vendor host named in the codeAlso duckduckgo.com — not the publisher's domain; check what for before connecting.
- What the honeypot saw
- no credential files read · no network
- What we could not test
- use of the skill by an agent
Connect it with a scoped credential, under the guard, and read the third-party hosts first. The code names duckduckgo.com as well as its own vendor. The guard injects BROWSER_GATEWAY_ALLOW_SESSION_AUTH only into requests to the host you bind (and its subdomains) and refuses the rest.
Never paste a credential into a chat, a ticket or a report, including ours. How the guard holds it.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 90/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Behavior trace
Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviationsStatic findings
result = subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.result = subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.result = subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.result = subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.