zola-api@2.2.2
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Query or update Zola wedding-planning data (vendors, budget, guests, seating, events/RSVPs, registry, gift tracker, inquiries, wedding website) straight from a shell with curl against mobile-api.zola.com, instead of running the zola-mcp server. Use when you want Zola data without the MCP, in a script, or on a machine where the MCP isn't installed. Triggers on "check Zola", "Zola vendors/budget/guests/RSVP/seating/registry", or any Zola wedding data request that should hit the API directly." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 66/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: Access to sensitive file paths; Access to sensitive file paths. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
# Prefer the env var zola-mcp itself reads (check its .env first):Fix: Stop enumerating or reading credential locations; take secrets from a declared environment variable the user sets on purpose.grep -h ZOLA_REFRESH_TOKEN ~/git/zola-mcp/.env 2>/dev/nullFix: Stop enumerating or reading credential locations; take secrets from a declared environment variable the user sets on purpose.Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
14 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim chrischall: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- Access to sensitive file paths≈ +4 on the totalStop enumerating or reading credential locations; take secrets from a declared environment variable the user sets on purpose.