Skills/ClawHub/zm-wechat-draft-publish-verify

zm-wechat-draft-publish-verify@0.1.0

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "ZM 公众号草稿发布与核验。用于将已准备好的 Markdown/HTML 公众号稿通过 zm-md2wechat-conversion-tool 推送到公众号草稿箱，并强制执行 draft/get 真实落库与排版核验。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher jerryxn · publishing for 143 daysInstalls 480Last detonated 24 h ago
$clawhub install zm-wechat-draft-publish-verify
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Install scripts ran; no agent task scenario for this bundle.
Tested
install scripts, with decoy credentials in place · second launch with the clock 45 days ahead · every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (2 scenarios; install scripts ran; no agent task scenario for this bundle) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 2 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessexited 1:
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.1sprocesssecond launch, clock +45 days, CI unset
0.1sprocessexited 1:

Static findings

No findings across 1,052 lines in 11 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈2,090 tok
1 file · 11 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.