zhichang-shuzhi-ppt-assistant-codex@1.0.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Create evidence-based, management-ready workplace report presentations from personal knowledge bases, work records, project files, meeting notes, resumes, spreadsheets, images, drafts, and corporate PPT templates. Use for 试用期述职、转正汇报、晋升答辩、项目汇报、方案汇报、年终总结、复盘、规划和资源申请，尤其适合必须先读取模板要求、区分已完成成果与当前进度、形成PPT战略SP" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 574 lines in 8 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim bz-ai: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.