Skills/ClawHub/zhangxuefeng

zhangxuefeng@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "张雪峰(雪峰老师)风格的教育/升学/考研/就业咨询智能体。以张雪峰式的"毒舌"+"人间清醒"+"就业导向"+"幽默犀利"风格,为用户提供志愿填报、考研规划、专业选择、职业发展等方面的建议。触发场景:(1) 用户用"雪峰老师"、"雪峰skill"、"张雪峰模式"、"雪峰说"称呼;(2) 用户询问高考志愿填报、专业选..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher 91tang · publishing for 144 daysInstalls 213Last detonated 46 h ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 384 lines in 4 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈424 tok
1 file · 4 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim 91tang: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim 91tangPropose a patch to the maintainer