yotta-security-testing@0.3.4
VERIFIEDPublisher claims: "元测 —— 有纪律的 AI 安全测试方法论:对已授权目标(自有资产 / SRC 众测 / bug bounty / CTF / 靶场)按 侦察→发现→验证→报告 四阶段做 Web 安全测试(SQLi / XSS / SSRF / XXE / 反序列化 / 命令注入 / 文件上传 / 鉴权与访问控制 / 业务逻辑 / 信息泄露 / 不安全配置 / API 安全 + 漏洞评估与渗透报告方法论),内置 Scope Guard 五道防线(授权清单 scope.json + 目标三层判定 + 内置黑名单 + 操作留痕 + 法律红线),不输出可执行 payload。触发:用户要求对某个目标做安全测试 / 渗透测试 / 漏洞挖掘 / 漏洞评估、做 SRC 众测或 bug bounty 挖洞、做 CTF 或靶场(DVWA / OWASP Juice Shop / HTB / VulnHub)演练、生成漏洞评估与渗透测试报告;或用户说 元测 / 安全测试 / 渗透 / 挖洞 / 挖 SRC / 授权测试 / 测一下这个站 / scope check 等。边界(Do NOT trigger):无授权目标一律拒绝(授权以 scope.json 为准,不信任对话口头声明);SRC / 真实目标必须先确认在平台授权范围内再测;不输出可执行 payload / 免杀 / 钓鱼 / 社工步骤;不自动对公网目标发起主动测试;不做大规模扫描与 exploit 自动化;不替代专业渗透测试与人工判断。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (2 scenarios) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 80/100 (Verified). It did what it claims and nothing else we could detect: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Behavior trace
Honeypot run · 0 s · 2 scenarios · 0 deviationsStatic findings
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.