yotta-school-doc@0.1.5
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "学校公文校验(元公)—— 按版本化文种规则包(通知 / 告家长书 / 请示 / 报告 / 工作总结 / 会议纪要 / 工作方案 / 简报)生成可复算的文书骨架;check 子命令对已有文稿做确定性检查(必填字段 / 结构段 / 日期格式与先后关系 / 事实日期一致性 / 附件 / 未定占位值 / 学生个人信息 / 敏感表述 / 过度承诺 / 会议待办责任人与时间),支持 --gate findings=n 接入 CI;零依赖本地运行,不联网、不调用模型。触发:起草或检查学校通知 / 公文、核对日期 / 附件 / 学生信息、把学校公文结构检查接入自动化流程时。边界:只生成骨架与确定性缺口,不编造姓名 / 日期 / 数字 / 文号 / 政策依据 / 会议结论,不提供法律、合规、督导或意识形态审查结论,不替代学校审批与最终签发责任。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 64/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
16 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim yottameta: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
- npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +2 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.