yotta-prompt@0.2.6
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "元引 —— 意图澄清 + 生态入口技能:用户输入一句模糊的话 / 一个词时,识别意图、给出 2-4 个候选方向、深挖(目标/范围/输出/约束),再串联到对应元阁技能输出可直接运行的提示词。常驻注入(always-load):每次新会话开始自动生效,接住「不会用 AI、不知道怎么提问」的用户。触发:用户不知道怎么提问、不知道想要什么、输入模糊的一句话 / 一个词、想被引导到合适技能时。边界:只澄清意图、不预设立场、不做安全评审;提示词不人为设限(不违规/不犯法/不越狱即可);不做 prompt 美化;纯本地离线。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 64/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
16 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim yottameta: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
- npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +2 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.