yotta-logwatch@0.3.2
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "元察 —— 跨智能体的安全日志分析检测技能:零依赖自研解析 auth/secure、Web 访问日志(common/combined)、PowerShell 脚本块日志、Windows 事件日志(Security/System),检测爆破 / webshell / 扫描 / 异常登录 / 可疑脚本块 / 可疑进程 / 账户操作 / 日志清空,输出时间线与中文教学报告。触发:用户给出登录日志 / Web 访问日志 / PowerShell 日志 / Windows 事件日志,要分析入侵痕迹、排查异常活动、审计本地日志时。边界:只读本地日志文件;不联网、不主动扫描、不修改任何其内容;仅用于已获授权 / 自有资产的安全审计。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario) on 2026-11-02 and scored it 72/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: Privileged sudo command; Privileged sudo command; Privileged sudo command. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Behavior trace
Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviationsStatic findings
What would make this Verified
8 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim yottameta: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- Privileged sudo command≈ +4 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.
- Access to sensitive file paths≈ +4 on the totalStop enumerating or reading credential locations; take secrets from a declared environment variable the user sets on purpose.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
- npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +2 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.