yotta-humanize@0.2.4
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "去 AI 味(元真)—— 把像 AI 写的中文改得更自然:粘贴文章、文案、报告或邮件,先得到 0-100 AI 味评分,再定位空泛升华、套话、AI 黑话、同义堆叠、机械排比、聊天残渣和标点滥用,输出可逐条核对的前后改写(词表替换 / 套话删除 / 残渣清理 / 标点限流)。触发:用户说「去 AI 味」「润色」「改写」「太像 AI」「像人写的」。边界:只处理已有文本,不生成内容、不改事实 / 数据 / 专有名词;需要判断的润色只给建议,不调用模型。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-02 and scored it 64/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
What would make this Verified
16 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim yottameta: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
- npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +2 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.