xinjianxue-skill-bff-cn@2.1.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "心鉴学「闺蜜关系专项顾问」技能包(bff)。 触发条件(**须同时满足**;且**须先向用户确认**用本次分析;用户未明确要用本服务时不得触发): 1. 用户的问题**明确落在「闺蜜关系专项顾问」的范围内**(范围见下文「本顾问的定位」),或用户点名要用本顾问; 2. 分析对象是用户本人,或用户**明确提及并已同意**分析的人;**不替用户分析未提及、未同意的第三方**。 接入要求(首次运行一次性完成,**不是**触发条件):AI 首次运行须先申请业务许可证,并用用户的 AI授权码完成账号绑定;之后每次调用携带许可证 + api_key 双凭证。 ⛔ 非触发情况(显式负例,命中任一条都**不要**调用本服务): - 日常闲聊、一般性情绪倾诉、安慰陪聊; - 用户只给了年月日 / 时间信息,未说明用途,或未确认要用本服务分析; - 要分析的是**未提及或未表示同意**的第三方(如「帮我看看这个人怎么样」但该对象未同意); - 提问不在本顾问范围内(属其他顾问或其他领域)。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 353 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim weixin97676414: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.