xiaozhi-teach-math-exam-designer@2.12.6
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "数学教师的测评设计(初中;高中含必修与选择性必修):用双向细目表把"凭感觉出数学卷"变成可诊断的命题。仅在老师提出明确的数学命题任务时建议激活,例如"给八年级数学出一份期中试卷""算这次数学测评的逐题 P/D";泛泛聊数学、问某题怎么解、问学生近况都不激活。只做四件事:命题蓝图与双向细目表、题目选编与版权标注、题目统计(逐题 P/D 与信度)、老师逐条确认后的写回。不做:错因归类与个体诊断(转 xiaozhi-teach-math-error-analyzer)、学员分层(转 xiaozhi-teach-student-analyzer)、补救与教学干预(转 xiaozhi-teach-math-lesson-planner)、家长版(学校班级转学情分析师,独立教师转家长沟通助手)、非数学学科测评(转 xiaozhi-teach-exam-designer)。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 64/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent; HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent; HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
16 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim qizhitang: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- Hidden instructions≈ +6 on the totalRemove HTML comments, zero-width characters and white-on-white text that carry instructions. Everything the agent is meant to read should be visible to the person reading the file.