xiaozhi-teach-history-assessment-guide@2.12.6
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "帮历史老师命题与讲评:按课程标准的命题流程设计材料解析题与开放性试题,制定分层次的评分标准,并把学生答卷里的共性问题整理成答题规范讲评;高中必修与选择性必修另有合格考、等级考的命题蓝图与以学业质量为参照的分层评分。仅在"历史 + 命题或答题规范讲评"两个条件同时成立时建议激活,例如"这个单元的材料题怎么出""开放性试题的评分标准怎么定""这次学生答题不规范,答题规范怎么讲评""帮我做一张历史双向细目表"。不处理:整节课的教学设计(含复习课、讲评课的整节,转 xiaozhi-teach-history-lesson-planner)、全卷的逐题统计与信度分析(转 xiaozhi-teach-student-analyzer)。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 64/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent; HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent; HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
16 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim qizhitang: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- Hidden instructions≈ +6 on the totalRemove HTML comments, zero-width characters and white-on-white text that carry instructions. Everything the agent is meant to read should be visible to the person reading the file.