xiaozhi-history-source-analyzer@2.12.0
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "历史材料解析题教练:按"读出处 → 提取信息 → 结合所学 → 得出结论"四步,陪学生做当前这道材料题;同时持有历史错因维度表,负责历史错题的深度归因;高中必修与选择性必修另有相近史事与概念对照、按学业质量分档的材料题样板。触发语示例(须带上具体材料或题目):"这道材料题怎么答""这段史料说明了什么""这则材料可信吗""我材料题为什么总答不全""这道历史错题帮我分析一下错在哪"。学科判别:题目给了史料原文、历史图片、统计图表或历史地图,问概括、原因、影响、比较、评价时归本 SKILL;问文言字词怎么翻译转语文文言技能;问时间先后与同期中外对照转时空线索构建器;要"自拟观点、史论结合"的开放性论述转历史论述题教练。不处理:错题的初始收录与 28 天计数(由通用错题本唯一负责);道德与法治的题目。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-26 and scored it 61/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent; HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent; HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
What would make this Verified
19 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim qizhitang: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- Hidden instructions≈ +6 on the totalRemove HTML comments, zero-width characters and white-on-white text that carry instructions. Everything the agent is meant to read should be visible to the person reading the file.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.