Skills/ClawHub/xiaosu-paper-reader

xiaosu-paper-reader@1.2.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "学术论文深度阅读技能。当用户提供 PDF 论文或论文文件路径时，自动执行全文翻译、 结构化讲解、图片解读和细节问答。适用场景：提供 PDF 文件路径、发送论文截图、 询问论文内容、请求解释某个术语或段落。 分析完成后可生成标准化摘要，方便后续生成 PPT（可选，非强制）。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher xiaosu-yj · publishing for 174 daysInstalls 1,248Last detonated 30 min ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 384 lines in 5 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈706 tok
1 file · 5 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim xiaosu-yj: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim xiaosu-yjPropose a patch to the maintainer