Skills/ClawHub/xiaohongshu-viral-topic-analyzer

xiaohongshu-viral-topic-analyzer@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "小红书爆款选题分析器。输入赛道/品类关键词,输出可直接执行的选题清单、标题公式、爆款结构拆解与发布策略。当用户提到 小红书选题/爆款/笔记怎么写/涨粉/选题没灵感/标题怎么写/笔记没人看/小红书运营/内容规划/对标账号/流量不好 时使用。触发词:小红书、选题、爆款、笔记、标题、封面、涨粉、流量、种草、对标、内容规划、运营。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher qq49371114 · publishing for 3 daysInstalls 31Last detonated 3d ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 941 lines in 9 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈595 tok
1 file · 9 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim qq49371114: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim qq49371114Propose a patch to the maintainer