xiaohongshu-matrix-notes@0.3.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Use when producing 小红书/RedNote matrix-account image+text 笔记 at scale — mimicking a 对标(benchmark) account and turning product photos into AI model try-on / li..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: Fake instruction boundary tag. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
| 2 定博主 | 出 1 张定妆图锁脸(或用对标提供的脸),**交用户确认**后才批量 | `scripts/ofox_gen.py "<prompt>" persona.png` |Fix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.No other findings across 601 lines in 7 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim dizhu: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.