xiaohongshu-imitation-writer@0.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Imitation-write viral social content-marketing notes. Analyzes a reference viral post's structure, style, and traffic logic, then generates original, differentiated content that matches the reference tone while combining your product and selling points — bypassing duplicate detection to iterate quality notes fast. Use when the user wants to imitate / rewrite a viral social note, do 爆款仿写 / 对标爆款 / original rewrite, or turn a reference note into a branded product note. Trigger keywords: social content, imitation, 仿写, rewrite, 改写, viral, 爆款, 对标. Requires an API key from wsdsocial.com." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 108 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim wsd-mj: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.