xiaohongshu-demand-mining@1.1.4
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "获取小红书社媒平台的评论内容做聚类与情感分析,抽取高频痛点、功能诉求与未被满足的需求,输出需求机会清单与佐证原文。支持四大能力:(1) 关键词搜索笔记/视频,可按点赞数、评论数、收藏数、发布时间、内容类型筛选排序;(2) 博主作品抓取,按主页链接获取博主的互动数据(粉丝量、点赞量或收藏量等)或公开作品列表;(3) 笔记(视频)详情,获取详情数据及互动数据等,分析笔记的市场表现;(4) 笔记评论分析,按笔记链接获取评论内容与互动数据。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-28 and scored it 64/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
What would make this Verified
16 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim why20261: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
- File type combined with upload action≈ +2 on the totalRemove the call, or declare the host in frontmatter and explain in the README what is sent and why.