xiaobo-essay-style@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "王小波杂文风格写作助手。基于《我的精神家园》45篇杂文的深度分析，提炼出逻辑性、趣味性、幽默感三大核心及七种可套用技法。触发词：王小波风格、小波风格、王小波式、wangxiaobo style、幽默杂文、逻辑推演、归谬法、杂文体、科普写作、趣味写作、花剌子模信使。 适用场景：学术内容通俗化改写、科普文章创作、杂文..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 614 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim roberning: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.